<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1275 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demands related to disallowed credit on capital goods, excess utilization of CENVAT credit, and the applicability of service tax on interconnection usage charges. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, while keeping the issue of limitation open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2018 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501237" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1275 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the demands related to disallowed credit on capital goods, excess utilization of CENVAT credit, and the applicability of service tax on interconnection usage charges. The impugned order was modified accordingly, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, while keeping the issue of limitation open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>