<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353004</link>
    <description>An addition for alleged sponsorship receipts could not be sustained where the assessment record contained no supporting material in the books of account, bank statements, FIR, raid report, or the assessee&#039;s replies. The finding that sponsorship money must have been received was based only on assumption, and a tax demand, together with consequential interest and penalty, cannot rest on surmises or conjecture without a factual basis. The HC therefore interfered in writ jurisdiction, held the addition unsustainable, and set aside the entertainment tax, interest, and penalty attributable to that component in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1273 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353004</link>
      <description>An addition for alleged sponsorship receipts could not be sustained where the assessment record contained no supporting material in the books of account, bank statements, FIR, raid report, or the assessee&#039;s replies. The finding that sponsorship money must have been received was based only on assumption, and a tax demand, together with consequential interest and penalty, cannot rest on surmises or conjecture without a factual basis. The HC therefore interfered in writ jurisdiction, held the addition unsustainable, and set aside the entertainment tax, interest, and penalty attributable to that component in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>