<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1272 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353003</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was established that the duty was paid by the respondent-assessee, justifying their claim for credit and refund. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with the specified conditions for claiming CENVAT credit, especially in transactions involving related entities. The decision highlighted the need for thorough examination of transactions and adherence to regulatory requirements to avoid disputes over credit entitlement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 13:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1272 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353003</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It was established that the duty was paid by the respondent-assessee, justifying their claim for credit and refund. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with the specified conditions for claiming CENVAT credit, especially in transactions involving related entities. The decision highlighted the need for thorough examination of transactions and adherence to regulatory requirements to avoid disputes over credit entitlement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=353003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>