<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1268 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352999</link>
    <description>Cropping of grey cotton and man-made fabrics was analysed under Chapter Note 3 of Chapter 52 and Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 55 to determine whether it amounted to &quot;any other process&quot; constituting manufacture. Applying noscitur a sociis, the note was read with the listed processes such as bleaching, mercerising, dyeing and printing, and cropping was treated as a mere mechanical finishing operation that did not cause a permanent change, create a new commercially different product, or fall within the same genus. Cropping therefore did not amount to manufacture, the fabrics remained grey fabrics, and the duty demand and penalty could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1268 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352999</link>
      <description>Cropping of grey cotton and man-made fabrics was analysed under Chapter Note 3 of Chapter 52 and Chapter Note 4 of Chapter 55 to determine whether it amounted to &quot;any other process&quot; constituting manufacture. Applying noscitur a sociis, the note was read with the listed processes such as bleaching, mercerising, dyeing and printing, and cropping was treated as a mere mechanical finishing operation that did not cause a permanent change, create a new commercially different product, or fall within the same genus. Cropping therefore did not amount to manufacture, the fabrics remained grey fabrics, and the duty demand and penalty could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>