<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1266 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the partners&#039; remuneration claimed by the assessee, citing the partnership deed&#039;s provisions and mutual agreement between the two partners. It upheld the disallowance of finance charges under section 40(a)(ia) as the entities admitted the income and paid taxes. The disallowance of payments under section 40A(2)(b) was partially confirmed, with the Tribunal deleting the balance amount due to the entities admitting a portion of the payments. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections, emphasizing compliance with partnership deed terms and tax obligations by income-receiving entities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1266 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the partners&#039; remuneration claimed by the assessee, citing the partnership deed&#039;s provisions and mutual agreement between the two partners. It upheld the disallowance of finance charges under section 40(a)(ia) as the entities admitted the income and paid taxes. The disallowance of payments under section 40A(2)(b) was partially confirmed, with the Tribunal deleting the balance amount due to the entities admitting a portion of the payments. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and partly allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections, emphasizing compliance with partnership deed terms and tax obligations by income-receiving entities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>