<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1263 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352994</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty orders for the Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 were unsustainable due to the absence of specific charges in the notices and orders, violating natural justice principles. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the penalty orders were deemed invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:40:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1263 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352994</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the penalty orders for the Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 were unsustainable due to the absence of specific charges in the notices and orders, violating natural justice principles. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the penalty orders were deemed invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352994</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>