<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1246 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352977</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI addressed the valuation of excisable goods for excise duty payment. The case involved goods cleared to a related unit at a lower valuation, leading to a demand for short levy of excise duty and penalty imposition. The Tribunal upheld the adjudication order, emphasizing the valuation based on comparable goods sold to independent buyers. The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, highlighting the importance of following specific valuation rules and principles, maintaining consistency with previous orders, and upholding Tribunal directions in remanding matters for adjudication. The decision clarified excisable goods valuation and application of legal precedents in determining excise duty liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:40:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1246 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352977</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI addressed the valuation of excisable goods for excise duty payment. The case involved goods cleared to a related unit at a lower valuation, leading to a demand for short levy of excise duty and penalty imposition. The Tribunal upheld the adjudication order, emphasizing the valuation based on comparable goods sold to independent buyers. The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, highlighting the importance of following specific valuation rules and principles, maintaining consistency with previous orders, and upholding Tribunal directions in remanding matters for adjudication. The decision clarified excisable goods valuation and application of legal precedents in determining excise duty liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>