<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1240 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352971</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, emphasizing similarities between the present case and the Juhi Alloys Ltd. judgment. The ruling in Juhi Alloys Ltd. was deemed applicable to the present case, leading to the allowance of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1240 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352971</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the Revenue, emphasizing similarities between the present case and the Juhi Alloys Ltd. judgment. The ruling in Juhi Alloys Ltd. was deemed applicable to the present case, leading to the allowance of the Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>