<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197085</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the appeal raised substantial questions of law concerning unjust enrichment in a refund case. The court considered the adjudicating authority&#039;s assessment of unjust enrichment and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to a refund. The Respondent waived service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 08:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197085</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the appeal raised substantial questions of law concerning unjust enrichment in a refund case. The court considered the adjudicating authority&#039;s assessment of unjust enrichment and the assessee&#039;s entitlement to a refund. The Respondent waived service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>