<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 960 - ITAT, AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197078</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all contested additions. The additions of Rs. 30,000 in the trading account, Rs. 111,047 in the name of Smt. Santosh Rani, Rs. 67,200 in the name of Smt. Salochna Devi, and Rs. 50,000 on account of low household expenses were all deleted. As a result, the set off of household expenses with cash credit was not necessary. The general relief entitlement ground did not require adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 15:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 960 - ITAT, AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197078</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting all contested additions. The additions of Rs. 30,000 in the trading account, Rs. 111,047 in the name of Smt. Santosh Rani, Rs. 67,200 in the name of Smt. Salochna Devi, and Rs. 50,000 on account of low household expenses were all deleted. As a result, the set off of household expenses with cash credit was not necessary. The general relief entitlement ground did not require adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>