<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 1162 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197079</link>
    <description>A statutory scheme that assigns mainly administrative functions to the Registrar and allied co-operative officers does not require every appointee to have a legal or judicial background, even where limited quasi-judicial powers exist. The Court found Section 3 of the M.P. State Co-operative Societies Act valid because the Act also provided appellate and revisional oversight through a Tribunal headed by a judicially qualified Chairman. The Tribunal&#039;s composition under Section 77(3)(b) and the safeguards in Section 77(6), including objective control, judicial review, and a reasonable opportunity to show cause, were also upheld as constitutionally adequate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 15:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 1162 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197079</link>
      <description>A statutory scheme that assigns mainly administrative functions to the Registrar and allied co-operative officers does not require every appointee to have a legal or judicial background, even where limited quasi-judicial powers exist. The Court found Section 3 of the M.P. State Co-operative Societies Act valid because the Act also provided appellate and revisional oversight through a Tribunal headed by a judicially qualified Chairman. The Tribunal&#039;s composition under Section 77(3)(b) and the safeguards in Section 77(6), including objective control, judicial review, and a reasonable opportunity to show cause, were also upheld as constitutionally adequate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>