<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 729 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197076</link>
    <description>The governing High Court rules authorised the Chief Justice to initiate administrative action through a committee, and consultation with judges could be achieved by circulation or meeting rather than simultaneous physical presence. The committee&#039;s recommendation remained a proposal until placed before the Full Court, and once approved in accordance with the prescribed procedure it became the Court&#039;s decision. Procedural irregularities were cured by the rules and by subsequent Full Court approval. The challenge to the grant of selection scale therefore failed, and the prior policy decision was capable of modification within the rule framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 729 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197076</link>
      <description>The governing High Court rules authorised the Chief Justice to initiate administrative action through a committee, and consultation with judges could be achieved by circulation or meeting rather than simultaneous physical presence. The committee&#039;s recommendation remained a proposal until placed before the Full Court, and once approved in accordance with the prescribed procedure it became the Court&#039;s decision. Procedural irregularities were cured by the rules and by subsequent Full Court approval. The challenge to the grant of selection scale therefore failed, and the prior policy decision was capable of modification within the rule framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197076</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>