https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197076 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, affirming that the Acting CJ had the authority to constitute the Committee under Rule 21(2). The Court held that consultation with all Judges was not mandatory under Rule 15 for evolving merit criteria. The Full Court's subsequent approval validated the Committee's recommendations, rendering the HC's decision unsustainable. Appeals were allowed. en-us Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 May 2024 12:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197076 The SC set aside the HC's judgment, affirming that the Acting CJ had the authority to constitute the Committee under Rule 21(2). The Court held that consultation with all Judges was not mandatory under Rule 15 for evolving merit criteria. The Full Court's subsequent approval validated the Committee's recommendations, rendering the HC's decision unsustainable. Appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197076