<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 17 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11096</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petition under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, as no referable question of law arose regarding the valuation of the property. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to accept the valuation by the registered valuer over the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s valuation, based on justifiable grounds and existing facts presented during the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 17 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11096</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petition under section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, as no referable question of law arose regarding the valuation of the property. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to accept the valuation by the registered valuer over the Departmental Valuation Officer&#039;s valuation, based on justifiable grounds and existing facts presented during the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>