<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352965</link>
    <description>Balance Cenvat credit on capital goods in a subsequent financial year was admissible only if the goods remained in the manufacturer&#039;s possession and use during that year. Rule 57AC(2)(a) allowed only 50% credit in the year of receipt, while Rule 57AC(2)(b) conditioned the deferred balance credit on continued possession and use. Rule 57AC(2)(c) concerning uninstalled capital goods received before 1 April 2000 did not override that requirement. As the capital goods had ceased to be used from December 2000, the statutory condition for claiming the balance credit in 2001-02 was not satisfied and recovery was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 08:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352965</link>
      <description>Balance Cenvat credit on capital goods in a subsequent financial year was admissible only if the goods remained in the manufacturer&#039;s possession and use during that year. Rule 57AC(2)(a) allowed only 50% credit in the year of receipt, while Rule 57AC(2)(b) conditioned the deferred balance credit on continued possession and use. Rule 57AC(2)(c) concerning uninstalled capital goods received before 1 April 2000 did not override that requirement. As the capital goods had ceased to be used from December 2000, the statutory condition for claiming the balance credit in 2001-02 was not satisfied and recovery was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>