<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1218 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352949</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a charitable society, in a tax dispute. It upheld the society&#039;s exemption claim under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, considering its microfinance activities as charitable. The Tribunal also overturned the cancellation of the society&#039;s registration under Section 12AA(3), emphasizing that the microfinance activities were indeed charitable. However, it acknowledged a violation of Section 13(1)(c) due to funds advanced to the Secretary but directed a limited disallowance. The Tribunal clarified that registration under Section 25 of the Companies Act was not mandatory for eligibility under Section 12AA. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partially successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 09:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1218 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352949</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a charitable society, in a tax dispute. It upheld the society&#039;s exemption claim under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act, considering its microfinance activities as charitable. The Tribunal also overturned the cancellation of the society&#039;s registration under Section 12AA(3), emphasizing that the microfinance activities were indeed charitable. However, it acknowledged a violation of Section 13(1)(c) due to funds advanced to the Secretary but directed a limited disallowance. The Tribunal clarified that registration under Section 25 of the Companies Act was not mandatory for eligibility under Section 12AA. The assessee&#039;s appeal was partially successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>