<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1207 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352938</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. J.K. Files &amp;amp; Tools, overturning the disallowance of various deductions such as trade discount, cash discount, and freight &amp;amp; insurance. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents, including the case of M/s. Raymond Ltd., to support the appellant&#039;s position that adjustments between different heads of duty payments during finalization of provisional assessment are permissible. The decision emphasized the validity of allowing adjustments and the allowance of freight and insurance charges as discounts, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant based on established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 08:49:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1207 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352938</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by M/s. J.K. Files &amp;amp; Tools, overturning the disallowance of various deductions such as trade discount, cash discount, and freight &amp;amp; insurance. The Tribunal relied on legal precedents, including the case of M/s. Raymond Ltd., to support the appellant&#039;s position that adjustments between different heads of duty payments during finalization of provisional assessment are permissible. The decision emphasized the validity of allowing adjustments and the allowance of freight and insurance charges as discounts, leading to a favorable outcome for the appellant based on established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>