<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1200 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352931</link>
    <description>The appellant challenged penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-payment of service tax. Despite citing lack of knowledge and financial constraints, the appellant failed to comply with tax obligations. The Tribunal and Commissioner(Appeals) both upheld the penalties, finding evidence of deliberate evasion and suppression of facts. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalties under the specified sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 17:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1200 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352931</link>
      <description>The appellant challenged penalties imposed under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 for non-payment of service tax. Despite citing lack of knowledge and financial constraints, the appellant failed to comply with tax obligations. The Tribunal and Commissioner(Appeals) both upheld the penalties, finding evidence of deliberate evasion and suppression of facts. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the penalties under the specified sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>