<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1198 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352929</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on insurance services linked to vehicles and employees depended on whether the vehicles qualified as capital goods and whether the insurance was used primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption. During the material period, input service coverage excluded services relating to motor vehicles that were not capital goods and also excluded life and health insurance used for personal consumption. As the lower authorities had not recorded conclusive findings on these foundational facts and had relied on precedent without independently determining them, denial of credit could not be sustained. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh findings and a de novo decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 08:49:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501091" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1198 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352929</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on insurance services linked to vehicles and employees depended on whether the vehicles qualified as capital goods and whether the insurance was used primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption. During the material period, input service coverage excluded services relating to motor vehicles that were not capital goods and also excluded life and health insurance used for personal consumption. As the lower authorities had not recorded conclusive findings on these foundational facts and had relied on precedent without independently determining them, denial of credit could not be sustained. The matter was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh findings and a de novo decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>