<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1195 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner to disallow the refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 due to the appellant&#039;s utilization of cenvat credit before the refund was sanctioned, contravening the rule and relevant notification. The Tribunal emphasized that refunds are only admissible when the credit is unutilized, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2017 08:49:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1195 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner to disallow the refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 due to the appellant&#039;s utilization of cenvat credit before the refund was sanctioned, contravening the rule and relevant notification. The Tribunal emphasized that refunds are only admissible when the credit is unutilized, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>