<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352925</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication regarding services related to transmission and distribution of electricity and erection, commissioning, or installation service. The denial of abatement under Notification No. 32/2004-ST for GTA service was upheld, and the appeal on this issue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2018 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1194 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352925</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by remanding the matter to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication regarding services related to transmission and distribution of electricity and erection, commissioning, or installation service. The denial of abatement under Notification No. 32/2004-ST for GTA service was upheld, and the appeal on this issue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>