https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352923 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the inadmissibility of hearsay evidence in confirming demands. The case against the appellant was solely based on hearsay evidence, lacking corroboration and direct evidence. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and the inadmissibility of hearsay evidence in deciding cases, ultimately concluding in favor of the appellant due to the absence of direct evidence and legal precedents. en-us Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Dec 2017 08:49:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352923 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the inadmissibility of hearsay evidence in confirming demands. The case against the appellant was solely based on hearsay evidence, lacking corroboration and direct evidence. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of corroborative evidence and the inadmissibility of hearsay evidence in deciding cases, ultimately concluding in favor of the appellant due to the absence of direct evidence and legal precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 17 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352923