<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352922</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Thermax Engineering Construction, in a service tax dispute. It held that advance payments were not subject to service tax as they were akin to earnest money. The tribunal also allowed credit for retention amounts and exempted services rendered abroad from service tax. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, while the appeal by the revenue was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352922</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, M/s Thermax Engineering Construction, in a service tax dispute. It held that advance payments were not subject to service tax as they were akin to earnest money. The tribunal also allowed credit for retention amounts and exempted services rendered abroad from service tax. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, while the appeal by the revenue was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>