https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352916 The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority after setting aside the impugned order. The refund claims were initially rejected for non-submission of documents but later sanctioned, with the refund credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund. Despite the Tribunal's ruling against unjust enrichment, the refund was not given to the appellant. The Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) were found to have acted against the Tribunal's order, leading to the Revenue filing an appeal before the High Court. The Tribunal emphasized awaiting the High Court's decision before reprocessing the refund in compliance with the law. en-us Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Dec 2017 08:48:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352916 The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority after setting aside the impugned order. The refund claims were initially rejected for non-submission of documents but later sanctioned, with the refund credited to the Consumer Welfare Fund. Despite the Tribunal's ruling against unjust enrichment, the refund was not given to the appellant. The Assistant Commissioner and Commissioner (Appeals) were found to have acted against the Tribunal's order, leading to the Revenue filing an appeal before the High Court. The Tribunal emphasized awaiting the High Court's decision before reprocessing the refund in compliance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352916