<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 673 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197067</link>
    <description>A licence is only permission to use premises and does not create any proprietary interest, so a condition barring use by any other person without prior written consent is breached where a company controlled by the licensee is allowed to use the premises without such consent. A shareholder-licensee cannot invoke lifting of the corporate veil to treat herself and the company as one and avoid the consequences of her own breach. In proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, the Estate Officer may examine whether occupation has become unauthorised and whether cancellation of the licence is valid; once cancellation is upheld, eviction follows and writ interference is limited absent perversity, jurisdictional error, or breach of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2017 13:54:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 673 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197067</link>
      <description>A licence is only permission to use premises and does not create any proprietary interest, so a condition barring use by any other person without prior written consent is breached where a company controlled by the licensee is allowed to use the premises without such consent. A shareholder-licensee cannot invoke lifting of the corporate veil to treat herself and the company as one and avoid the consequences of her own breach. In proceedings under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, the Estate Officer may examine whether occupation has become unauthorised and whether cancellation of the licence is valid; once cancellation is upheld, eviction follows and writ interference is limited absent perversity, jurisdictional error, or breach of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197067</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>