https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197064 A second habeas corpus petition under Article 226 and Section 491 is ordinarily not maintainable on the same ground after an earlier petition has been decided on merits; only a new ground, or an adequately explained omitted ground in exceptional circumstances, may justify reopening. Habeas corpus is generally moved by the detenu, or by a friend or relation acting for him, and a complete stranger normally lacks standing unless illegality is immediately apparent. The text also notes that smuggling-related activity may, on proper material, bear on public order or State security and can support preventive detention under Rule 30, though no final merits ruling was required here. en-us Fri, 28 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2017 13:05:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197064 A second habeas corpus petition under Article 226 and Section 491 is ordinarily not maintainable on the same ground after an earlier petition has been decided on merits; only a new ground, or an adequately explained omitted ground in exceptional circumstances, may justify reopening. Habeas corpus is generally moved by the detenu, or by a friend or relation acting for him, and a complete stranger normally lacks standing unless illegality is immediately apparent. The text also notes that smuggling-related activity may, on proper material, bear on public order or State security and can support preventive detention under Rule 30, though no final merits ruling was required here. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 May 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197064