https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197063 A writ petition under Article 226 was held inappropriate where an assessee's exemption claim depended on disputed questions of fact about the processing activity and the use of power. The controversy was whether the assessee merely carried out colour fixation by steam or sodium silicate without power, or instead dyed cotton woven fabrics with the aid of power on a machine. Because resolution required evidence and factual determination, the High Court declined to entertain writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petition. en-us Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:59:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197063 A writ petition under Article 226 was held inappropriate where an assessee's exemption claim depended on disputed questions of fact about the processing activity and the use of power. The controversy was whether the assessee merely carried out colour fixation by steam or sodium silicate without power, or instead dyed cotton woven fabrics with the aid of power on a machine. Because resolution required evidence and factual determination, the High Court declined to entertain writ jurisdiction and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197063