https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197060 In preventive detention, failure to place before the detaining authority and to furnish to the detenu a vital document that may reasonably affect subjective satisfaction vitiates the detention order. The FIR here related to the same export transactions and shipping bills forming the basis of detention, but it did not name the detenu and contained no suspicion against him; it was therefore a relevant material document that could have influenced the authority either way. Its suppression amounted to non-application of mind and also impaired the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5). The detention order was therefore unsustainable. en-us Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:40:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197060 In preventive detention, failure to place before the detaining authority and to furnish to the detenu a vital document that may reasonably affect subjective satisfaction vitiates the detention order. The FIR here related to the same export transactions and shipping bills forming the basis of detention, but it did not name the detenu and contained no suspicion against him; it was therefore a relevant material document that could have influenced the authority either way. Its suppression amounted to non-application of mind and also impaired the detenu's right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5). The detention order was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Oct 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197060