<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1281 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197059</link>
    <description>The Board found Respondent Nos. 2, 3, and 4 guilty of oppression, declaring the EGM and resolutions of 09.09.2005 illegal. The change of the registered office was deemed unauthorized. The petitioners were confirmed as directors, and other reliefs sought were denied. The matter was disposed of with directions to take necessary steps with the ROC, Karnataka, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2017 12:19:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1281 - COMPANY LAW BOARD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197059</link>
      <description>The Board found Respondent Nos. 2, 3, and 4 guilty of oppression, declaring the EGM and resolutions of 09.09.2005 illegal. The change of the registered office was deemed unauthorized. The petitioners were confirmed as directors, and other reliefs sought were denied. The matter was disposed of with directions to take necessary steps with the ROC, Karnataka, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>