<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the assessee&#039;s profits/losses from shares and mutual funds as capital gains rather than business income. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was deleted. The Tribunal stressed the significance of consistency in classification and the requirement for the AO to express dissatisfaction before disallowing expenses under section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1270 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat the assessee&#039;s profits/losses from shares and mutual funds as capital gains rather than business income. Additionally, the disallowance under section 14A was deleted. The Tribunal stressed the significance of consistency in classification and the requirement for the AO to express dissatisfaction before disallowing expenses under section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>