<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1312 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197047</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to exclude certain comparables and reconsider others based on functional dissimilarity and other criteria. They were also instructed to rework segmental results for some comparables and provide the appellant with an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:58:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=501009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1312 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197047</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to exclude certain comparables and reconsider others based on functional dissimilarity and other criteria. They were also instructed to rework segmental results for some comparables and provide the appellant with an opportunity to be heard. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197047</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>