<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1169 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352900</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, finding the explanations plausible and the Tribunal&#039;s views reasonable. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with deletions of various additions made by the Assessing Officer, including for jewellery, undisclosed investment in house property, cash payments, unexplained expenditure in land, interest on a loan, undisclosed income for the block period, and an amount found during a search.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 18:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1169 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352900</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on all issues, finding the explanations plausible and the Tribunal&#039;s views reasonable. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the assessee, with deletions of various additions made by the Assessing Officer, including for jewellery, undisclosed investment in house property, cash payments, unexplained expenditure in land, interest on a loan, undisclosed income for the block period, and an amount found during a search.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>