<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1159 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352890</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a detailed reconsideration of reconciliation statements and related issues, including the argument on limitation. The appeals were allowed via remand, with directions for thorough examination of appellants&#039; submissions and department&#039;s responses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1159 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352890</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority for a detailed reconsideration of reconciliation statements and related issues, including the argument on limitation. The appeals were allowed via remand, with directions for thorough examination of appellants&#039; submissions and department&#039;s responses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>