https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352885 The Tribunal upheld charges of removal of goods but remanded the case for reworking demand due to an overlap, emphasizing the need for quantification. The case involved cross-appeals regarding duty evasion, penalties, and overlapping demands. The Tribunal instructed a detailed inspection of records and documents for further assessment by the adjudicating authority, refraining from expressing views on quantification. All appeals were disposed of by remanding the case for further quantification. en-us Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Feb 2018 18:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352885 The Tribunal upheld charges of removal of goods but remanded the case for reworking demand due to an overlap, emphasizing the need for quantification. The case involved cross-appeals regarding duty evasion, penalties, and overlapping demands. The Tribunal instructed a detailed inspection of records and documents for further assessment by the adjudicating authority, refraining from expressing views on quantification. All appeals were disposed of by remanding the case for further quantification. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352885