https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352870 The court allowed the appeal, quashing the order admitting the Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court found that a prior dispute existed between the parties before the initiation of insolvency proceedings, indicating that the proceedings should not have been admitted. Consequently, further proceedings based on the impugned order were stopped, with no costs imposed. en-us Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 23 Dec 2017 09:06:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352870 The court allowed the appeal, quashing the order admitting the Insolvency Resolution Process under Section 9 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The court found that a prior dispute existed between the parties before the initiation of insolvency proceedings, indicating that the proceedings should not have been admitted. Consequently, further proceedings based on the impugned order were stopped, with no costs imposed. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352870