<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 40 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11075</link>
    <description>The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Commissioner to restore the application for revision on record and hear it on merits within three months. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering sufficient cause for delay and following established legal principles in condoning delays in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 40 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11075</link>
      <description>The court set aside the impugned order and directed the Commissioner to restore the application for revision on record and hear it on merits within three months. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering sufficient cause for delay and following established legal principles in condoning delays in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>