https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197035 The court quashed proceedings against accused 2 to 8 under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to lack of specific allegations establishing their vicarious liability. The judge emphasized the need for concrete evidence showing the accused's active role in the company's affairs for vicarious liability. Without evidence implicating the accused in the cheque issuance or bank instructions, the judge ruled in favor of the petitioners and quashed the prosecution against them. The decision highlighted the importance of specific allegations and evidence to establish vicarious liability and instructed the trial court to proceed with the case against other accused promptly. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:40:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197035 The court quashed proceedings against accused 2 to 8 under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to lack of specific allegations establishing their vicarious liability. The judge emphasized the need for concrete evidence showing the accused's active role in the company's affairs for vicarious liability. Without evidence implicating the accused in the cheque issuance or bank instructions, the judge ruled in favor of the petitioners and quashed the prosecution against them. The decision highlighted the importance of specific allegations and evidence to establish vicarious liability and instructed the trial court to proceed with the case against other accused promptly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 19 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197035