<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1118 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352849</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues, emphasizing the peculiar circumstances where TDS deduction was not feasible due to uncertainty of specific parties and amounts at the time of provision creation. The tribunal found no tax evasion or loss of revenue as the assessee paid due tax in full and did not benefit from the provision for expenses. Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the decisions of the Ld. CIT(A) were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:10:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1118 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352849</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on both issues, emphasizing the peculiar circumstances where TDS deduction was not feasible due to uncertainty of specific parties and amounts at the time of provision creation. The tribunal found no tax evasion or loss of revenue as the assessee paid due tax in full and did not benefit from the provision for expenses. Therefore, the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the decisions of the Ld. CIT(A) were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>