https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352833 The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing the appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, acknowledging the appellant's judicial custody as sufficient cause for the delay. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, subject to the appellant paying costs to the respondent's counsel. The respondent was directed to file a reply within six weeks, with the next hearing scheduled for 25th April 2018. en-us Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:09:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352833 The Tribunal granted condonation of delay in filing the appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, acknowledging the appellant's judicial custody as sufficient cause for the delay. Relying on legal precedents emphasizing substantial justice over technicalities, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, subject to the appellant paying costs to the respondent's counsel. The respondent was directed to file a reply within six weeks, with the next hearing scheduled for 25th April 2018. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 07 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352833