https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352827 The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the appeals of the appellant and another individual were allowed. The court affirmed the entitlement to CENVAT credit for the recipient of services, rejecting the imposition of penalties under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the recipient's limited responsibility in verifying details and documentation, concluding that discrepancies in supplier details due to the service provider's tax evasion did not justify denying the credit. en-us Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:09:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352827 The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, and the appeals of the appellant and another individual were allowed. The court affirmed the entitlement to CENVAT credit for the recipient of services, rejecting the imposition of penalties under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The judgment emphasized the recipient's limited responsibility in verifying details and documentation, concluding that discrepancies in supplier details due to the service provider's tax evasion did not justify denying the credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352827