<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11066</link>
    <description>Under Chapter XX-C, market value for compulsory pre-emptive purchase must be fixed on fair, objective and property-specific criteria as on the date of the agreement. A large property with an existing structure cannot be valued mechanically by comparing it with a few smaller vacant sale instances, because size, location, structure, title uncertainties, marketability and the pool of potential purchasers materially affect value. The Authority&#039;s reliance on limited comparable sales and simple extrapolation, without independent evaluation of the relevant circumstances, was unsustainable and the purchase order was set aside, with the matter remitted for fresh valuation on proper criteria.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11066</link>
      <description>Under Chapter XX-C, market value for compulsory pre-emptive purchase must be fixed on fair, objective and property-specific criteria as on the date of the agreement. A large property with an existing structure cannot be valued mechanically by comparing it with a few smaller vacant sale instances, because size, location, structure, title uncertainties, marketability and the pool of potential purchasers materially affect value. The Authority&#039;s reliance on limited comparable sales and simple extrapolation, without independent evaluation of the relevant circumstances, was unsustainable and the purchase order was set aside, with the matter remitted for fresh valuation on proper criteria.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>