<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1083 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352814</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim of duty paid by the assessee-Respondents for goods seized after the legal ban on plastic packaging, emphasizing the non-marketable nature of the goods due to the ban. The decision highlighted the entitlement of rebate for goods cleared for export but seized before export, ultimately sustaining the Commissioner (Appeals) order and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:08:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1083 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352814</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the refund claim of duty paid by the assessee-Respondents for goods seized after the legal ban on plastic packaging, emphasizing the non-marketable nature of the goods due to the ban. The decision highlighted the entitlement of rebate for goods cleared for export but seized before export, ultimately sustaining the Commissioner (Appeals) order and dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352814</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>