<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1078 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352809</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal concluded that the transfer of rights and privilege of export of sugar quota constitutes a sale of goods based on precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar cases involving licenses with intrinsic value. Drawing analogies with market commodities, the Court affirmed that such transactions are subject to sales tax as they involve items with inherent value and market transferability. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the classification of the transaction as a sale of goods without any service element involved, in line with the legal interpretation provided by the Supreme Court in previous judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1078 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352809</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal concluded that the transfer of rights and privilege of export of sugar quota constitutes a sale of goods based on precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar cases involving licenses with intrinsic value. Drawing analogies with market commodities, the Court affirmed that such transactions are subject to sales tax as they involve items with inherent value and market transferability. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, confirming the classification of the transaction as a sale of goods without any service element involved, in line with the legal interpretation provided by the Supreme Court in previous judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>