<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1323 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197032</link>
    <description>A writ petition was rejected because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The court declined to entertain the writ at the first instance and directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal before the appellate authority. It also recorded that the petitioner could seek condonation of delay if the appeal was filed within the time indicated, leaving the appellate forum to consider the matter in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2017 08:07:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1323 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197032</link>
      <description>A writ petition was rejected because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The court declined to entertain the writ at the first instance and directed the petitioner to pursue the appeal before the appellate authority. It also recorded that the petitioner could seek condonation of delay if the appeal was filed within the time indicated, leaving the appellate forum to consider the matter in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>