<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 55 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11061</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision not to refer any question of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act. It found that the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the application was justified as no legal issue necessitated the High Court&#039;s intervention. Additionally, the Court emphasized that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) exceeded authority by modifying the Tribunal&#039;s final order, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s application under section 256(2) without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 55 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11061</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision not to refer any question of law under section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act. It found that the Tribunal&#039;s rejection of the application was justified as no legal issue necessitated the High Court&#039;s intervention. Additionally, the Court emphasized that the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) exceeded authority by modifying the Tribunal&#039;s final order, leading to the dismissal of the assessee&#039;s application under section 256(2) without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>