<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 41 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11060</link>
    <description>The court held that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to recall its appellate order under the guise of rectification. It must only amend the original order to correct mistakes apparent from the record. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, directing the Tribunal to rehear the rectification application and make amendments if necessary, in line with section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=50079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 41 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11060</link>
      <description>The court held that the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to recall its appellate order under the guise of rectification. It must only amend the original order to correct mistakes apparent from the record. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, directing the Tribunal to rehear the rectification application and make amendments if necessary, in line with section 35 of the Wealth-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=11060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>