<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 542 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197017</link>
    <description>A fixed-term tenancy can sustain eviction on expiry under Section 11(1)(e) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982, where the tenant admits a lease for a specified period and that admission is not displaced. The commentary also explains that under Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a lease exceeding one year must be created by a registered instrument, but execution is a matter of substance and may be proved from surrounding facts, conduct, and admissions; the absence of both parties&#039; signatures on the document was therefore not ative. A tenant cannot raise a new contrary objection after taking a different stand below, and the eviction decree was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:57:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 542 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197017</link>
      <description>A fixed-term tenancy can sustain eviction on expiry under Section 11(1)(e) of the Bihar Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1982, where the tenant admits a lease for a specified period and that admission is not displaced. The commentary also explains that under Section 107 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, a lease exceeding one year must be created by a registered instrument, but execution is a matter of substance and may be proved from surrounding facts, conduct, and admissions; the absence of both parties&#039; signatures on the document was therefore not ative. A tenant cannot raise a new contrary objection after taking a different stand below, and the eviction decree was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>