https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197013 A High Court exercising certiorari jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute new grounds for a Labour Court's factual findings absent jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or an error apparent on the face of the record; interference on that basis was unjustified. Retrenchment is invalid where the employer fails to prove strict compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, requiring notice or wages in lieu and retrenchment compensation at or before retrenchment; a bare assertion of offer or a belated demand draft is insufficient. The Labour Court's award was restored, and reinstatement with back wages followed. en-us Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:07:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197013 A High Court exercising certiorari jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot reappreciate evidence or substitute new grounds for a Labour Court's factual findings absent jurisdictional error, breach of natural justice, or an error apparent on the face of the record; interference on that basis was unjustified. Retrenchment is invalid where the employer fails to prove strict compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, requiring notice or wages in lieu and retrenchment compensation at or before retrenchment; a bare assertion of offer or a belated demand draft is insufficient. The Labour Court's award was restored, and reinstatement with back wages followed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197013