https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197012 Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act is confined to computation of a pre-existing or already adjudicated right, and cannot be used to determine whether workmen have a right to continued employment, whether a transferee corporation is liable under a settlement, or whether successor liability exists. Claims that require adjudication of entitlement, employer liability, or service continuation must be raised as an industrial dispute under Section 10. On transfer of an undertaking, Section 25FF places retrenchment compensation liability primarily on the transferor unless the statutory proviso is met, and such liability cannot be imposed on the transferee through summary computation proceedings. en-us Tue, 23 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:52:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197012 Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act is confined to computation of a pre-existing or already adjudicated right, and cannot be used to determine whether workmen have a right to continued employment, whether a transferee corporation is liable under a settlement, or whether successor liability exists. Claims that require adjudication of entitlement, employer liability, or service continuation must be raised as an industrial dispute under Section 10. On transfer of an undertaking, Section 25FF places retrenchment compensation liability primarily on the transferor unless the statutory proviso is met, and such liability cannot be imposed on the transferee through summary computation proceedings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 23 Apr 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197012