<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 685 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197007</link>
    <description>Interim protection was sought to restrain the respondent from alienating, encumbering, disposing of, or creating third-party rights over its plant, machinery, business assets, or any part of them pending notice. The High Court issued notice to the respondent and granted interim restraint for three weeks, preserving the status quo over the identified assets until further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:39:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 685 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197007</link>
      <description>Interim protection was sought to restrain the respondent from alienating, encumbering, disposing of, or creating third-party rights over its plant, machinery, business assets, or any part of them pending notice. The High Court issued notice to the respondent and granted interim restraint for three weeks, preserving the status quo over the identified assets until further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>