<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1060 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to grant the deduction under section 54 of the Act as claimed. The decision emphasized compliance with section 54 requirements, considering the nature of the acquisition as construction, not purchase, and completion of construction within the specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=500723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1060 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to grant the deduction under section 54 of the Act as claimed. The decision emphasized compliance with section 54 requirements, considering the nature of the acquisition as construction, not purchase, and completion of construction within the specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=352791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>